Steve Bannon was indicted for contempt of Congress on Friday. He is expected to turn himself in on Monday.
Summary
Trump advisor Steve Bannon was indicted by a federal grand jury Friday for failure to comply with a congressional subpoena regarding the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
- Last month, Bannon was held in contempt of Congress by the committee investigating the events of Jan. 6.
- In refusing the subpoena, Bannon argued he was protected by executive privilege, which allows records and testimony by the president and members of his staff (though Bannon was not an executive staff member at the time) a certain level of shielding from congressional and judicial access.
- Attorney General Merrick Garland praised the indictment, saying the charges âreflect the departmentâs steadfast commitmentâ to âpursu[ing] equal justice under the law.â*
- While being held in contempt of Congress is a bipartisan tradition, âcriminal indictments for contempt are exceedingly rareâ according to the Associated Press.
- Bannon is expected to turn himself in on Monday, followed by a court appearance.
- The New York Times characterized Bannonâs indictment as a commitment by the Biden administration to protect âa fundamental element of democracy, the peaceful transfer of powerâ while also using it to spell doom for former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.
- Mother Jones called the indictment a âbig boostâ for the Jan. 6 committee, which it said is âlikely to deter other officialsâ from refusing to cooperate.
- CNNâs report gave insight into Bannonâs possible role in the events of Jan. 6, quoting the House committee in saying he appeared âto have played a multi-faceted role in the eventsâ of that day.
- Fox News noted Bannon is unlikely to be imprisoned for the charges, saying itâs been more than four decades since the last indictment on similar charges was jailed.
- Newsmax and Breitbart ran wire reports on the indictment.
- RedState criticized the indictment, calling it âa jokeâ and saying contempt of Congress is âanother law thatâs rarely enforcedâ but that increasingly, the law is being used to persecute Trump-associated figures.
Author’s Take
*Bidenâs DOJ is definitely committed to equal application of the law, like when parents are labeled domestic terrorists or when states are no longer allowed to determine the laws of their elections. The Department of Justice is being weaponized to prosecute political adversaries.
Yet, the notion of a person outside the executive branch asserting executive privilege could provide a rough road ahead. The Congressional Research Service briefly wrote on the topic in 2019 and noted a 2007 opinion from the White House and Department of Justice argues it could cover non-executive-employee individuals.
© Dallas Gerber, 2021